July 27: Last Day for UN Gun-Banners to Hammer out Small Arms Treaty

A dangerous threat to our Second Amendment right to 'keep and bear arms.'

Pledge Your Opposition to Hillary's Global Agenda

Will Secretary of State Hillary Clinton endorse the end product? Yes.
Will President Obama sign it? Yes.
Will the U.S. Senate ratify it? Uncertain, it may depend on you.
Call your senators today and encourage them to man up and vote against ratification. Our Democrat senators will be under extreme pressure to support ratification.
Sen. Jeff Merkley (D) DC (202) 224-3753, Salem (503) 362-8102 | Sen. Ron Wyden (D) - DC (202) 224-5244, Salem (503) 589-4555

Related Article from Pat Dollard: UN Gun Control Treaty Will Kill Second Amendment On July 27 Read More......

Belmont Club: The Janus Shield

4/26/2011 by Richard Fernandez - The National Journal says the administration is negotiating a legal framework with Russia that would allow it to exchange sensitive technical information with Moscow, including data on missile defense.

[Excerpt] 39 Republican Senators wrote to the President in mid-April this year and urged him not to enter into any agreements that would give Russia a “red-button” veto over missile defense, including the transfer of sensitive technology. The letter seems to object precisely to the kind of sharing contemplated by the Defense Technology Cooperation Agreement which “would not require congressional approval”. Read more at Belmont Club...

Read More......

Why Does Interpol Need Immunity from American Law?

THE CORNER, 12/23/2009 by Andy McCarthy (Hat tip: Nic, Lee, Jean) - You just can't make up how brazen this crowd is. One week ago, President Obama quietly signed an executive order that makes an international police force immune from the restraints of American law.

[Excerpt from article] "Why would we elevate an international police force above American law? Why would we immunize an international police force from the limitations that constrain the FBI and other American law-enforcement agencies? Why is it suddenly necessary to have, within the Justice Department, a repository for stashing government files which, therefore, will be beyond the ability of Congress, American law-enforcement, the media, and the American people to scrutinize?"

Interpol is the shorthand for the International Criminal Police Organization. It was established in 1923 and operates in about 188 countries. By executive order 12425, issued in 1983, President Reagan recognized Interpol as an international organization and gave it some of the privileges and immunities customarily extended to foreign diplomats. Interpol, however, is also an active law-enforcement agency, so critical privileges and immunities (set forth in Section 2(c) of the International Organizations Immunities Act) were withheld. Specifically, Interpol's property and assets remained subject to search and seizure, and its archived records remained subject to public scrutiny under provisions like the Freedom of Information Act. Being constrained by the Fourth Amendment, FOIA, and other limitations of the Constitution and federal law that protect the liberty and privacy of Americans is what prevents law-enforcement and its controlling government authority from becoming tyrannical.

On Wednesday [? Thurs., Dec. 17], however, for no apparent reason, President Obama issued an executive order removing the Reagan limitations. That is, Interpol's property and assets are no longer subject to search and confiscation, and its archives are now considered inviolable. This international police force (whose U.S. headquarters is in the Justice Department in Washington) will be unrestrained by the U.S. Constitution and American law while it operates in the United States and affects both Americans and American interests outside the United States.

Interpol works closely with international tribunals (such as the International Criminal Court — which the United States has refused to join because of its sovereignty surrendering provisions, though top Obama officials want us in it). It also works closely with foreign courts and law-enforcement authorities (such as those in Europe that are investigating former Bush administration officials for purported war crimes — i.e., for actions taken in America's defense).

Why would we elevate an international police force above American law? Why would we immunize an international police force from the limitations that constrain the FBI and other American law-enforcement agencies? Why is it suddenly necessary to have, within the Justice Department, a repository for stashing government files which, therefore, will be beyond the ability of Congress, American law-enforcement, the media, and the American people to scrutinize?

---
Steve Schippert [and Clyde Middleton] have more at ThreatsWatch.org: Wither Sovereignty [Includes Executive Order as amended]

Also see UN Dispatch: Interpol Under Siege by Uninformed Bloggers (Comments are especially interesting --bc) Read More......

U.S. Sovereignty May End in Copenhagen

(Hat tip: Stella Guenther via email)
See long version of Lord Monckton's Oct. 14 speech (1:35:33 HQ Video)

mnmajoritydotorg, 10/16/2009 - On October 14, Lord Christopher Monckton gave a presentation in St. Paul, MN on the subject of global warming. In this 4-minute excerpt from his speech, he issues a dire warning to all Americans regarding the United Nations Climate Change Treaty that is scheduled to be signed in Copenhagen in December 2009.

A draft of the treaty can be read here:
http://www.globalclimatescam.com/docu...

Page 18: Section 38 of the "Share vision for long-term cooperation action plan" contains the text for forming the new government.

Page 44-45: Section 46 "Objectives, scope, and guiding principles" contains the text for enforcement and establishment of the rule of law.

There has been considerable debate raised about Monckton's conclusion that the Copenhagen Treaty would cede US sovereignty. His comments appear to be based upon his interpretation of the The Supremacy Clause in the US Constitution (Article VI, paragraph 2). This clause establishes the Constitution, Federal Statutes, and U.S. TREATIES as the supreme law of the land. Concerns have been raised in the past that a particularly ambitious treaty may supersede the US Constitution. In the 1950s, a constitutional amendment, known as the Bricker Amendment, was proposed in response to such fears, but it failed to pass. You can read more about the Bricker Amendment in a 1953 Time Magazine article:
National Affairs: THE BRICKER AMENDMENT: A Cure Worse Than The Disease?

Lord Monckton served as a policy adviser to Margaret Thatcher. He has repeatedly challenged Al Gore to a debate to which Gore has refused. Monckton sued to stop Gore's film "An Inconvenient Truth" from being shown in British schools due to its inaccuracies. The judge found in-favor of Monckton, ordering 9 serious errors in the film to be corrected. Lord Monckton travels internationally in an attempt to educating the public about the myth of global warming. END

RELATED:
10/23/2009 - Poll: US belief in global warming is cooling
10/18/2009 - Snip: "There has been considerable debate raised about Monckton’s conclusion that the Copenhagen Treaty would cede US sovereignty. His comments appear to be based upon his interpretation of the The Supremacy Clause in the US Constitution (Article VI, paragraph 2). This clause establishes the Constitution, Federal Statutes, and U.S. TREATIES as the supreme law of the land. Concerns have been raised in the past that a particularly ambitious treaty may supersede the US Constitution. In the 1950s, a constitutional amendment, known as the Bricker Amendment (1953 Time Magazine article), was proposed in response to such fears, but it failed to pass."
Read More......

Imagine There's No Countries

CNSNews.com (via Patriot Post email), 9/28/2009 by Rich Galen, Political Analyst - "Interesting that many of us thought the election of Barack Obama might signal the end of American Independence as we surrendered sovereignty to the United Nations. Imagine my surprise, then, to find that Obama has decided to give up American power to a group that doesn't even officially exist: The Group of 20, which is shorthanded to the G-20. In an example of governmental inflation at its most dangerous, the G-20 was originally the G-6, then Canada was allowed to sit at the grownups table and it became the G-7. When the Soviet Union returned to being good old Russia, they were invited in and it became the G-8. The G-20 is supposed to be a meeting of the finance ministers and central bankers of the 20 largest economies. But these G-X meetings have now become summits. The meeting in Pittsburgh last week, included a significant number of the heads of states who had been in New York a few days earlier for the opening of the UN and who decided to make the trek along the Pennsylvania Turnpike to spend a day or two in the Steel City. ... Obama knows he can never cede sovereignty to the UN, but he may be able to get away with the G-20 as the international Board of Directors dealing with everything from banking regs to global warming to human rights to labor law to ... whatever. Obama knows America -- even Air America -- would never sit still for letting the United Nations make decisions for us. ... However, sharing sovereignty with the 20 largest economies on the planet is a potentially saleable deal as long as Obama doesn't say 'We are sharing sovereignty with the 20 largest economies on the planet.' You say things like, 'We are establishing new rules for international banking which will avoid the problems of last September.' One of those new rules will be an international reserve currency which does not have 'UNITED STATES OF AMERICA' printed anywhere on it. ... And we've been wasting our time worrying about Obama's relationship with ACORN." Read More......

Note to FED: Don't Tread on Oregon's Sovereignty!

4/2/2009, (H/t: Lyn Riverstone) - A Memorial (a memo to Congress and the White House), sponsored by Rep. Richardson and 21 Republican co-sponsors, was introduced to assert Oregon's sovereignty once again. It has been assigned "HJM17" (House Joint Memorial 17, a House and Senate Memo) to the House Rules Committee where it's fate will be decided. The Memorial "Urges Congress to refrain from imposing mandates on states and to allow State of Oregon to freely exercise sovereignty granted to it under Tenth Amendment of Constitution of United States."

See HJM17: http://www.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measures/hjm1.dir/hjm0017.intro.html

Request for action (with contact information):

A supporter from Eastern Oregon writes,

We must pressure the Committee to move it to a hearing where testimonials can be taken, the wording worked [out], and then introduced to the floor for a vote. Our main focus is the Chair (Rep. Roblan), Vice-Chair (Rep. Berger) and any Committee member who is a co-sponsor (Garrard).  Call, email, send letters and visit them.

Rules Committee (House)
Representative Arnie Roblan (Chair)
Party: D  District: 9
503-986-1409
900 Court St NE, H-272, Salem,,  OR, 97301
rep.arnieroblan@state.or.us

Representative Vicki Berger (Vice-Chair)
Party: R  District: 20
503-986-1420
900 Court St. NE., H-479, Salem, OR, 97301
rep.vickiberger@state.or.us

Representative Bill Garrard (co-sponsor)
Party: R  District: 56
503-986-1456
900 Court St. NE., H-480, Salem, OR, 97301
rep.billgarrard@state.or.us

Representative Chris Edwards
Party: D  District: 14
503-986-1414
900 Court St. NE, H-283, Salem, OR, 97301
rep.chrisedwards@state.or.us

Representative Sara Gelser
Party: D  District: 16
503-986-1416
900 Court St. NE H-285, Salem, OR, 97301
rep.saragelser@state.or.us

Representative Bob Jenson
Party: R  District: 58
503-986-1458
900 Court St. NE., H-481, Salem, OR, 97301
rep.bobjenson@state.or.us

Representative Mary Nolan
Party: D  District: 36
503-986-1436
900 Court St. NE., H-295, Salem, OR, 97301
rep.marynolan@state.or.us

Representative Tobias Read
Party: D  District: 27
503-986-1427
900 Court St. NE, H-490, Salem, OR, 97301
rep.tobiasread@state.or.us



Email Blast (copy and paste into your BCC: field)
rep.arnieroblan@state.or.us,
rep.vickiberger@state.or.us,
rep.billgarrard@state.or.us,
rep.chrisedwards@state.or.us,
rep.saragelser@state.or.us,
rep.bobjenson@state.or.us,
rep.marynolan@state.or.us,
rep.tobiasread@state.or.us

[Reordered]
"The powers not delegated to the United States, nor prohibited by the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or the people." -- The 10th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution

Only specific functions enumerated in the U.S. Constitution are granted to the Federal Government by the States - if it's not listed, the Federal Government can't do it. Oregon has strayed far from this ideal, taking orders such as the Real-ID Act and begging for bailout money instead of acting as the sovereigns we are.


-- Also of interest:
CampaignForLiberty.com
EndTheFed.us

Read More......

States' Rights & Sovereignty

In response to increasing federal encroachment, a growing number of states have passed and proposed resolutions to assert the Tenth Amendment and the Bill of Rights of the Constitution. Visit INFOWARS to see what other states are doing... Read More......