The Left wants to control all water and land, any way they can!

NUNES BLOG, 12/15/2010 by Representative Devin Nunes Blog (R-CA) - Feinstein Embraces “Pearl Harbor Style” Legislating "Radical environmentalists have realized that they cannot win a public debate arguing that a two-inch bait fish is more important than families in the San Joaquin Valley and are scrambling for a new message. They are also crafting a sneak attack to take control of our water.

The Left’s need to re-image the Delta water debate is particularly desperate due to a ruling in the U.S. District Court which rebuked the federal government as having used “sloppy science” to justify the man-made drought. Judge Oliver Wanger ordered federal agencies back to the drawing board.

However, the Left is already pressing ahead with its backup plan with the help of Senator Dianne Feinstein. That plan is concealed in massive $1.1 trillion federal spending bill for 2012 and would designate the entire Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta as a National Heritage Area. If it becomes law, the Heritage designation would establish a new federal mandate to protect the natural, scenic, historic, cultural, and recreational resources of the Delta - a thinly veiled effort to cut off valley water supplies." Read more at Nunes Blog to see what is contained in the Omnibus bill (p. 880) regarding CA waters...

RELATED
MICHELLE MALKIN, 12/15/2010 by Michelle Malkin - Omnibus double whammy: The Dems’ lame-duck land grabs

---

Note: If you haven't yet read Holly Swanson's book Set Up & Sold Out: Find Out What Green Really Means you need to do so, NOW! (Also available at Benton County Republican HQ) --bc Read More......

Another Example of shameful Global Warming Propaganda

(Hat tip: John Eidson, author)
Angry Kid, A Greenpeace Global Warming Video - "In a threatening tone, this angry young kid implies that man-made global warming theory is beyond dispute, a totally bogus assertion. Why does the environmental left so often resort to false claims?

Dr. Patrick Moore, a co-founder of Greenpeace, expressed the thoughts below after leaving the organization due to his belief that the modern environmental movement has become a bastion of far-left extremism. When the Soviet Union collapsed, fears of a nuclear holocaust diminished. Looking for a new cause, anti-war activists flooded into the environmental movement, bringing with them their strident pro-Marist, pro-Sandinista and anti-capitalist views of the world. Dr. Moore writes:

“Since its founding in the late 1960s, the modern environmental movement has created a vision that was international in scope and had room for people of all political persuasions.”

“The traditional sharp division between left and right was rendered meaningless by the common desire to protect our life support systems. Truth mattered, and science was respected for the knowledge it brought to the political debate.”

"Now, this broad based vision is challenged by a new philosophy of radical environmentalism. In the name of deep ecology, many environmentalists have taken a sharp turn to the ultra-left, ushering in a mood of extremism and intolerance."

"These factors have combined to contribute to a new variant of the environmental movement that is so extreme that many people, including myself, believe its agenda is a greater threat to the global environment than that posed by the mainstream of society."

Environmental extremism is causing an increasing number of international scientists to change sides in the global warming debate, yet the alarmist community continues to claim that man's impact on climate change is beyond dispute. To read Dr. Evans’ article about greenhouse gas theory, click HERE.

Related article: (link not working - use back button and then scroll down to title)
Backlash goes viral over 10:10 eco film "No Pressure" Read More......