Showing posts with label emissions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label emissions. Show all posts
Wednesday, January 27, 2016
26 states ask Supreme Court to halt Obama’s carbon emissions plan
This should be interesting. One state after another have been pushing back on the new EPA carbon emission guidelines, with many of them refusing to file a plan for compliance until the courts have weighed in. Now some of the biggest energy producing states are trying to bring the situation to a head well in advance of the normal challenge and appeal process.
Read more at Hotair.com Read More......
Read more at Hotair.com Read More......
Labels:
carbon,
emissions,
EPA,
states,
Supreme Court
Friday, June 19, 2015
EPA proposes tougher mileage standards for trucks (to prevent global warming)
The Obama administration is issuing new rules intended to improve fuel efficiency for medium and heavy-duty trucks and cut pollution blamed for global warming. The Environmental Protection Agency issued new rules that would lower carbon dioxide emissions from trucks and vans by 24 percent by 2027. It would cut fuel costs by about $170 billion and reduce oil consumption by up to 1.8 billion barrels over the lifetime of vehicles sold under the rule.
Read more at Fox News Read More......
Read more at Fox News Read More......
Labels:
carbon dioxide,
emissions,
EPA,
fuel standards
Tuesday, March 26, 2013
U.S. Carbon Emissions Down Due to Increased Use of Natural Gas
The most underreported recent environmental story has been the dramatic decline in energy-related carbon emissions — nearly back to mid-1990s levels, and falling. ✧ Maybe it’s because that story just doesn’t fit the left’s mantra that traditional energy sources are destroying the environment. Read more at Outside the Beltway...
Read More......
Labels:
Agenda 21,
carbon,
down,
emissions,
Global Warming,
hydraulic fracking,
natural gas
Sunday, September 18, 2011
WSJ: EPA Again Delays Greenhouse-Gas Rule
9/15/2011 - WASHINGTON—The Environmental Protection Agency is again delaying a plan to curb greenhouse-gas emissions from power plants, saying it needs more time to propose the rule. ✧ The move comes amid intense pushback from business groups and Republican lawmakers who complain a recent slate of EPA proposals are chilling business investment and hindering the economic recovery. Late last month, the White House forced the EPA to abandon an air-pollution rule that business groups said would kill millions of jobs. ✧ An EPA official said the agency is committed to the rule, which it is legally required to propose. "We are working on a schedule and will release it as soon as possible," the official said. "This is EPA's decision. It's a complex rule. We just needed more time." Read more at the Wall Street Journal...
Read More......
Labels:
delay,
emissions,
EPA,
greenhouse-gas,
rules
Wednesday, April 7, 2010
WH to Congress: Energy-only bill would be ‘unfortunate’
THE HILL/E2 Wire, 4/6/2010 by Ben Geman - White House climate czar Carol Browner said Tuesday that the Obama administration is urging Senate lawmakers not to proceed with an “energy only” bill that shelves limits on greenhouse gas emissions. Read more at The Hill's energy & environment blog...
Read More......
Labels:
Browner,
congress,
czar,
emissions,
energy,
greenhouse gas,
legislation,
limits
Monday, June 1, 2009
Feldstein: Cap-and-Trade: All Cost, No Benefit
WASHINGTON POST, 6/1/2009 by Martin Feldstein - The Obama administration and congressional Democrats have proposed a major cap-and-trade system aimed at reducing carbon dioxide emissions. Scientists agree that CO2 emissions around the world could lead to rising temperatures with serious long-term environmental consequences. But that is not a reason to enact a U.S. cap-and-trade system until there is a global agreement on CO2 reduction. The proposed legislation would have a trivially small effect on global warming while imposing substantial costs on all American households. And to get political support in key states, the legislation would abandon the auctioning of permits in favor of giving permits to selected corporations. Read more at the Washington Post...
Hat tip: John H. Detweiler
John says, "It may be all cost and no benefit but it is politically correct. Besides, it make us feel good." Read More......
Hat tip: John H. Detweiler
John says, "It may be all cost and no benefit but it is politically correct. Besides, it make us feel good." Read More......
Labels:
cap-and-trade,
CO2,
emissions,
environment,
Global Warming,
national,
progressives
Monday, May 18, 2009
Obama to set first CO2 emissions rule for auto industry
BLOOMBERG, 5/18/2009 by Kim Chipman and John Hughes - President Barack Obama will announce tomorrow new rules for vehicle emissions and mileage, setting the first-ever nationwide standard for greenhouse-gas pollution, according to people familiar with the plan. Read more at bloomberg.com...
Read More......
Labels:
automotive,
emissions,
greenhous gas,
industry,
rules
Monday, March 16, 2009
NYT: Biofuels make greenhouse gases worse, scientists say
2/8/2009 - Almost all biofuels used today cause more greenhouse-gas emissions than conventional fuels if the full emissions costs of producing these "green" fuels are taken into account, two studies published Thursday [2/7/2009] have concluded. --The benefits of biofuels have come under increasing attack in recent months, as scientists took a closer look at the global environmental cost of their production. Read the rest of this article at the Seattle Times...
Read More......
Labels:
biofuel,
emissions,
energy,
greenhouse-gas,
national
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)














