By Ben Domenech
If income inequality is the defining challenge of our time, why did President Obama spend so much time on policies unrelated to it? Why did he go down a policy path which led in the opposite direction? And why, even today, is he bypassing any possibility of brokering a bipartisan effort to combat “the defining challenge” and instead prioritizing a clumsy, tired, politically dead-end solution – minimum wage hikes – which without question has a negative effect on low-skill job creation while aiding his powerful union allies? Read more at the Federalist...
Saturday, December 7, 2013
Obama’s Shallow Inequality Speech And The Presidency That Might Have Been
Labels:
big business,
economy,
income,
inequality,
labor unions,
Obama
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment