Showing posts with label psychology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label psychology. Show all posts

Thursday, May 23, 2013

YOU ARE CRAZY: New Psychiatric Guidelines Target Hoarding...and a Host of Other “Illnesses”

It’s not a stretch to suggest that Americans are over medicated. In 2011 doctors across the nation wrote an astounding four billion medical prescriptions, amounting to an average of 13 prescriptions for every man, woman and child in the United States.   In the next few weeks the American Psychiatric Associations is releasing their updated fifth version their Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5); the so-called ‘bible’ of psychiatric diagnoses. The new manual promises to take mental illness and the use of prescription drugs to a whole new level.   You may not be considered “crazy” or “mentally ill” today, but under the new guidelines experts say half of us will be diagnosed with a psychiatric condition in the future.

Read more at SHTFPlan.com Read More......

Thursday, November 22, 2012

A Conservative finds clues from a Liberal to fight Liberalism

This 2009 article from blogger, A Goy and his Blog, with video and graphs is interesting. Essentially, the conservative's job is education not compromise. Find out why (fairly long piece but valuable).  He starts with this question, "Why do leftist ideologues persist with each new decade in clinging to a perennially discredited Utopian fantasy?"

Compromising with Moral Adolescence: A Losing Strategy Read More......

Friday, June 5, 2009

United In Hate, Parts 1 & 2

Jamie Glazof, Front Page contributor and author of United in Hate: The Left's Romance with Tyranny and Terror, discusses leftist psychology and how it aligns with brutal totalitarian regimes at the David Horowitz Freedom Center, May 14, 2009, in Los Angeles, California.

United in Hate, Part 1 (20:50)


United in Hate, Part 2 (20:10)

Hat tip: Maggie's Farm Read More......

Thursday, June 4, 2009

WILL: Green With Guilt

WASHINGTON POST, 6/4/2009 by George Will - Going Green to Alleviate Guilt -- but Not Much Else. ∴ The point of "utopian environmentalism" was to reduce guilt. During the green bubble, many Americans became "captivated by the twin thoughts that human civilization could soon come crashing down -- and that we are on the cusp of a sudden leap forward in consciousness, one that will allow us to heal ourselves, our society, and our planet. Apocalyptic fears meld seamlessly into utopian hopes." Suddenly, commonplace acts -- e.g., buying light bulbs -- infused pedestrian lives with cosmic importance. But: "Greens often note that the changing global climate will have the greatest impact on the world's poor; they neglect to mention that the poor also have the most to gain from development fueled by cheap fossil fuels like coal. For the poor, the climate is already dangerous." Read more at the Washington Post...

Hat tip: John H. Detweiler
John says, "Will seems to be talking about Corvallis -- where feeling good is more important than substance." Read More......

Sunday, March 29, 2009

You're not paranoid if they really are out to get you

NRO: THE CORNER, 3/26 posted by John J. Miller (H/t: Dr. Sanity) - Paranoid Style with a Ph.D.

From UC-Berkeley, the school that told us about the "psychological factors" underpinning conservatism (i.e., "fear and aggression," "dogmatism," etc.), comes a brand-new effort to expand the horizons of human knowledge:
Now, with backing from an anonymous donor, the University of California, Berkeley ... is creating a Center for the Comparative Study of Right-Wing Movements. According to experts in the field it is the first of its kind in higher education.


Caution: This stuff is dangerous. --bc Read More......

Monday, March 16, 2009

AGW Proponents see skepticism as 'a disorder'

On 3/4/2009, Brendan O’Neill, posted the following at spiked (H/t: Watts Up With That?):
The idea that ‘climate change denial’ is a psychological disorder – the product of a spiteful, wilful or simply in-built neural inability to face up to the catastrophe of global warming – is becoming more and more popular amongst green-leaning activists and academics. And nothing better sums up the elitism and authoritarianism of the environmentalist lobby than its psychologisation of dissent. The labelling[sic] of any criticism of the politics of global warming, first as ‘denial’, and now as evidence of mass psychological instability, is an attempt to write off all critics and sceptics as deranged, and to lay the ground for inevitable authoritarian solutions to the problem of climate change. Historically, only the most illiberal and misanthropic regimes have treated disagreement and debate as signs of mental ill-health.

This weekend, the University of West England is hosting a major conference on climate change denial. Strikingly, it’s being organised by the university’s Centre for Psycho-Social Studies. It will be a gathering of those from the top of society – ‘psychotherapists, social researchers, climate change activists, eco-psychologists’ – who will analyse those at the bottom of society, as if we were so many flitting, irrational amoeba under an eco-microscope. The organisers say the conference will explore how ‘denial’ is a product of both ‘addiction and consumption’ and is the ‘consequence of living in a perverse culture which encourages collusion, complacency and irresponsibility’ (1). It is a testament to the dumbed-down, debate-phobic nature of the modern academy that a conference is being held not to explore ideas – to interrogate, analyse and fight over them – but to tag them as perverse.

There's much more to read at Watts Up with That... including this gem found in the comments:

Stephen Brown (01:18:28):

Two rather appropriate quotes lifted directly from the home-page of http://www.grumpyoldsod.com/index.asp

We might mock now, but this demonising of the ‘Deniers’ is a most frightening development.

When government doesn’t agree with the people,
it’s time to change the people - Bertolt Brecht

The best way to take control over a people and control them
utterly is to take a little of their freedom at a time, to erode
rights by a thousand tiny and almost imperceptible
reductions. In this way the people will not see those rights
and freedoms being removed until past the point at which
these changes cannot be reversed - Adolf Hitler
Read More......