Showing posts with label profit. Show all posts
Showing posts with label profit. Show all posts
Saturday, January 17, 2015
Senator’s husband stands to profit big from government deal
Ever wonder how lowly paid lawmakers leave office filthy rich? Sen. Dianne Feinstein is showing how it’s done. The US Postal Service plans to sell 56 buildings — so it can lease space more expensively — and the real estate company of the California senator’s husband, Richard Blum, is set to pocket about $1 billion in commissions.
Read more at Page Six Read More......
Read more at Page Six Read More......
Labels:
Diane Feinstein,
profit,
US Postal Service
Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Stossel: Don't Give BACK
FOX BUSINESS, 4/27/2011 by John Stossel - "I’m annoyed by businesses’ discomfort with business. Too many act like there’s something wrong with making money. Billionaire Eli Broad gives billions to charities and talks about “giving back." I gave him a hard time about that, and he responded, 'Well, I'm not sure what the difference is between giving and giving back.'
I like how GMU Economics Professor Don Boudreaux explained the difference today in this letter that he wrote to a hotel chain:
See article here. Read More......
I like how GMU Economics Professor Don Boudreaux explained the difference today in this letter that he wrote to a hotel chain:
- Dear Ritz-Carlton:
Thanks for your e-mail celebrating your and your employees' participation in "Give Back Getaways" - activities in which you and your employees (along with some of your customers) "give back to the community."
Have you taken something that doesn't belong to you? If so, by all means give it back!...If, though, you've not taken anything that doesn't belong to you, you possess nothing that you can give BACK.
Being a profitable corporation, you certainly possess something that you can GIVE; and I applaud the generosity that prompts you, your employees and your customers to GIVE.
But, please…drop the rhetoric of "giving BACK." …It fuels the common misapprehension that corporate profits are either ill-gotten gains or, at best, wealth subtracted from that of other persons in society.
… your success at business means that you CREATE wealth. You value the $$$ you get for renting a hotel room by more than you value keeping that room vacant, and your guests value the opportunity to spend a few nights …
Your profits aren't pirate booty; they're legitimate earnings."
See article here. Read More......
Labels:
anti-business,
business,
Marxism,
mischaracterization,
profit,
zero-sum
Thursday, July 30, 2009
Profits We Should Cheer
The Quest for Profit Can Benefit Health Care
WASHINGTON POST, 7/30/2009 by Stephen L. Carter - A specter is haunting America: the specter of profit. We have become fearful that somewhere, somehow, an evil corporation has found a way to make lots of money. ∴ Flash back three years. In 2006, Exxon Mobil announced the highest profit in the history of American corporate enterprise. Politicians and pundits stumbled over each other to call for an investigation and for some sort of confiscatory tax on the money the company earned. Profit, it seemed, was an evil, but large profit was even worse. ∴ Today, the debate on the overhaul of the health-care system sparks a shiver of deja vu. The leitmotif of the conversation about the coming shape of health insurance is that the villain is the system of private insurance. "For-profit" firms come under constant attack from activists and members of Congress. Read more at the Washington Post...
Hat tip: John Detweiler
John writes, "Something else to make you uneasy." Read More......
WASHINGTON POST, 7/30/2009 by Stephen L. Carter - A specter is haunting America: the specter of profit. We have become fearful that somewhere, somehow, an evil corporation has found a way to make lots of money. ∴ Flash back three years. In 2006, Exxon Mobil announced the highest profit in the history of American corporate enterprise. Politicians and pundits stumbled over each other to call for an investigation and for some sort of confiscatory tax on the money the company earned. Profit, it seemed, was an evil, but large profit was even worse. ∴ Today, the debate on the overhaul of the health-care system sparks a shiver of deja vu. The leitmotif of the conversation about the coming shape of health insurance is that the villain is the system of private insurance. "For-profit" firms come under constant attack from activists and members of Congress. Read more at the Washington Post...
Hat tip: John Detweiler
John writes, "Something else to make you uneasy." Read More......
Labels:
anti-capitalism,
business,
congress,
national,
profit
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)














