Wednesday, September 30, 2009

Hockey Stick Is Dead

THE HEARTLAND INSTITUTE (via email), 9/30/2009 - One of the most notorious and phony pieces of data underlying global warming alarmism -- the “hockey stick” graph -- has been shattered in a posting today on the World Wide Web. ∴ In 1998, Dr. Michael Mann, then at the University of Virginia, now a Penn State climatologist, published a paper that purported to show that based on tree-ring information, the Earth’s climate was in its hottest period in the past 1,000 years. ∴ The graph is dubbed the “hockey stick” and becomes famous worldwide. Al Gore uses it in his movie An Inconvenient Truth in the famous “elevator scene.” ∴ In the years since then, Steve McIntyre, a Canadian mathematician and climate realist, attempted without success to win access to Mann’s data and to replicate his hockey stick graph. His suspicions grew that Mann’s tree rings didn’t tell a valid story with a giant uptick at the right side of the graph, implicating the twentieth century as the “hottest period in 1,000 years.” ∴Then last year Mann published another paper bolstering his tree ring claim in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, which has a strict data-archiving policy. Thanks to that policy, McIntyre fought and won access to the data just last week. ∴ Having the tree-ring data in complete form, McIntyre replicates it and plots it, and the infamous hockey stick graph disappears. Not only does it disappear, it goes negative. The conclusion is inescapable: The tree-ring data were hand-picked to get the desired result. ∴ You can read McIntyre’s full report, complete with re-plotted graphs and some outstanding responses, at Watts Up With That? Anthony Watts’ superb site for commentary on puzzling things in life, nature, science, weather, climate change, technology, and recent news.

3 comments:

TheGreenMiles said...

Established science, which took thousands of scientists much of their entire lives to create, has been "shattered" by ... a blog post by a polluter front group? Can that now be shattered by a comment from a snarky jerk? If so, that just happened.

Dan Miller said...

Brilliant, intelligent response, Mr. Grant. You ignore the information contained in the link and instead unleash an ad hominem attack on the messenger. The shallowness of your rebuttal exposes the bankruptcy of the science underlying the global warming crisis.

Dan Miller
Heartland Institute

JN said...

I always try to get my information on global warming from organizations funded largely by Exxon-Mobile, like the Heartland Institute. They tend to be super-neutral and extremely reliable. They would never disregard a broad scientific consensus in order to push the narrow ideological agenda of their corporate benefactors.

Keep flailing, Mr. Miller, the gig is up.